GCNeophyte
09-09 12:37 AM
My wife is scheduled to appear for fingerprinting at 1 om a future scheduled date. However I learned from someone that she can go for the fingerprinting even earlier in the day and she will be fine. Is this true? Has anyone experienced this?
I have tried this when i went for my finger printing for my EAD. My interview was in afternoon and went around 8:30am and they did allow me.
I have tried this when i went for my finger printing for my EAD. My interview was in afternoon and went around 8:30am and they did allow me.
wallpaper 2010 wallpaper Emma Stone
apk_sdpd
01-21 07:46 PM
Hi,
My PERM got denied next day after filing 7th year H1B extension, Is my H1 will approve?
extension filied on Premium processing. what are the chance me to continue on H1 and green card process.
PERM filied: 12/10/2008
Audit: 12/19/2009
H1B ending: 02/19/2011
H1B filied for 7th year extn: 01/18/2011
PERM denied: 01/20/2011
Please let me know if know such issues...
Thanks
My PERM got denied next day after filing 7th year H1B extension, Is my H1 will approve?
extension filied on Premium processing. what are the chance me to continue on H1 and green card process.
PERM filied: 12/10/2008
Audit: 12/19/2009
H1B ending: 02/19/2011
H1B filied for 7th year extn: 01/18/2011
PERM denied: 01/20/2011
Please let me know if know such issues...
Thanks
immilaw
09-19 06:16 PM
My company has just changed the rules. From now they are unwilling to pay the costs incurred in the visa extensions for the spouse.
Is this legal? Does anyone have any links etc that I can pass on to HR if this is illegal. Thanks.
Under the law, the employer is only obligated to pay the training fee, i.e. $750 or $1500. The rest of the fee including the H-4 fee can be paid by the employer or the employee.
Is this legal? Does anyone have any links etc that I can pass on to HR if this is illegal. Thanks.
Under the law, the employer is only obligated to pay the training fee, i.e. $750 or $1500. The rest of the fee including the H-4 fee can be paid by the employer or the employee.
2011 makeup Emma Stone. quot
same_old_guy
07-09 06:00 PM
AILA update :
AILF's Legal Action Center Seeks Plaintiffs on EB Visa Number Availability
Issue (Updated 7/9/07)
What's cooking ?
AILF's Legal Action Center Seeks Plaintiffs on EB Visa Number Availability
Issue (Updated 7/9/07)
What's cooking ?
more...
maheshf
03-19 11:45 PM
Gurus Here is my situation:
1) I am in my 4th year of H1-B still valid
2) My 1-140 is pending (Concurrently filed in July 2007) so more than > 180 days
3) Have approved EAD and AP
4) My Current company was a joint version between company A-B . differnt name X
5) Today they decide to split and My job will move to company A by end of this month. Work won�t change..will keep doing what have been doing But now employee of comany A not X
What are my options? I am worried about my GC process..will I loose everything and have to restart the process since I can not evoke my AC21 ..since it�s not approved yet.
Please Advise
-Mahesh
1) I am in my 4th year of H1-B still valid
2) My 1-140 is pending (Concurrently filed in July 2007) so more than > 180 days
3) Have approved EAD and AP
4) My Current company was a joint version between company A-B . differnt name X
5) Today they decide to split and My job will move to company A by end of this month. Work won�t change..will keep doing what have been doing But now employee of comany A not X
What are my options? I am worried about my GC process..will I loose everything and have to restart the process since I can not evoke my AC21 ..since it�s not approved yet.
Please Advise
-Mahesh
smuggymba
12-18 08:31 AM
Cap on skilled immigration unlawful: UK court - World News - IBNLive (http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cap-on-skilled-immigration-unlawful-uk-court/137822-2.html?from=tn)
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
more...
interfile
08-26 05:51 PM
Can somebody post the procedure and/or the sample/format of a letter to USCIS requesting to interfile?
Has anybody successfully gone through the procedure for interfiling I-485 from EB to FB?
Has anybody successfully gone through the procedure for interfiling I-485 from EB to FB?
2010 Oh hey, Emma Stone,
suren1
09-24 11:49 AM
based on the published data.. here are the predicted dates by crystal ball ;)
15-Apr-2001 Oct
1-May-2001 Nov
1-Oct-2001 Dec
15-Nov-2001 Jan
1-Dec-2001 Feb
1-Jan-2002 Mar :p
1-Feb-2002 Apr
22-Feb-2002 Unavailable:o
15-Apr-2001 Oct
1-May-2001 Nov
1-Oct-2001 Dec
15-Nov-2001 Jan
1-Dec-2001 Feb
1-Jan-2002 Mar :p
1-Feb-2002 Apr
22-Feb-2002 Unavailable:o
more...
gc_kaavaali
05-07 12:19 PM
Gurus ?? any idea ???
hair In this photo: Emma Stone
gc_check
02-12 11:16 PM
You have to get from your attorney or employer only. There is no other way you can get this. For joining for a new employer, the new job my be same or similar if you are using EAD / AC21 to continue GC processing.
more...
drirshad
07-01 08:26 AM
Ya thats true but these people must return these GC's as they were processe by mistake, anyday they figure it out these guys will be out of US ....
hot emma stone zombieland. jthomas
hpandey
06-23 01:29 PM
If after joining the H1b employer he has travelled out of the country, got the H1 stamping done and then returned to US then he is ok. It is the last admittance that counts . He should be maintaining his status legally since his last entry in US which is more important. Nothing to worry about.
more...
house Emma Stone Gallery
sanjose16
02-23 03:27 PM
Currently my wife is on H4
I'm planning to file H1 for my wife (through another employer on April 1st, 2009). Regardless of the situation (H1B Cap lottery process or general process) if my wife's H1B petition is accepted, processed and approved (generally betwen April 15th 2009 and May 31st 2009), she will get work permit (with start date of Oct 1st, 2009) by May or mid June, 2009.
My company is also planning to file for my H1 Extension (along with H4 Extension) in April (cannot be filed it seems due to other cases) So, in this scenario if my H1 extension (along with my wife's H4 extension) is filed after April 1st 2009, then we will have an overlap situation (as USCIS will be receiving two petitions (one for H1 and one for H4) for my wife) in the same timeframe. How will USCIS deal with these scenarios?
As long as her H4 is approved before her H1 (if she gets through lottery and approval process), there won't be a problem (as H1 will be replacing her H4 to my understanding).
But if her H4 is approved after her H1B approval, then there is a risk that her H1B will be cancelled because of H4 approval.
Please let me know solution to this problem. Thanks in Advance
I'm planning to file H1 for my wife (through another employer on April 1st, 2009). Regardless of the situation (H1B Cap lottery process or general process) if my wife's H1B petition is accepted, processed and approved (generally betwen April 15th 2009 and May 31st 2009), she will get work permit (with start date of Oct 1st, 2009) by May or mid June, 2009.
My company is also planning to file for my H1 Extension (along with H4 Extension) in April (cannot be filed it seems due to other cases) So, in this scenario if my H1 extension (along with my wife's H4 extension) is filed after April 1st 2009, then we will have an overlap situation (as USCIS will be receiving two petitions (one for H1 and one for H4) for my wife) in the same timeframe. How will USCIS deal with these scenarios?
As long as her H4 is approved before her H1 (if she gets through lottery and approval process), there won't be a problem (as H1 will be replacing her H4 to my understanding).
But if her H4 is approved after her H1B approval, then there is a risk that her H1B will be cancelled because of H4 approval.
Please let me know solution to this problem. Thanks in Advance
tattoo tattoo wallpaper emma stone
bhatt
04-02 02:21 PM
I did it online on 3/21/09 and got approved for me and my wife on 3/31/09. 10 days total turn around! I was amazed to see USCIS's efficiency on cases filed online. I heard the opposite that if you file online it was taking long time. Mine was at NSC
For TSC paper filing is faster than eletronic filing;).
For TSC paper filing is faster than eletronic filing;).
more...
pictures From Left to Right: Zombieland
vnsriv
07-05 01:05 PM
Dude,
I don't have 15 mts time to search on forum. I had a question and I asked, Lasantha promptly answered. And you further wasted my time by writing your expert opinion and now I am wasting my time further replying to you. No hard feelings adios!
I don't have 15 mts time to search on forum. I had a question and I asked, Lasantha promptly answered. And you further wasted my time by writing your expert opinion and now I am wasting my time further replying to you. No hard feelings adios!
dresses Exclusive photo of Emma Stone
yabadaba
10-19 09:04 AM
its applicable to everybody...if ur victim of a crime...u can get gc too.
more...
makeup Emma Stone - Zombieland
LostInGCProcess
07-20 01:30 PM
Thanks, Chandu.
Did you move to a different place or changed within the city where you currently live? I was reading an article yesterday and it said, if we move outside the area where we are currently located, it could trigger an RFE. I dont know how far its true.
Thanks!!
Did you move to a different place or changed within the city where you currently live? I was reading an article yesterday and it said, if we move outside the area where we are currently located, it could trigger an RFE. I dont know how far its true.
Thanks!!
girlfriend house emma stone bangs
ashwaghoshk
07-27 10:00 PM
I am from health care industry and have a bachelors degree. My GC has been initiated under Eb3 category. We do not need the PERM process so an I 140 will be filed once the prevaling wage determination is cleared by the DOL. Recently I learnt that though I have the bachelors degree it is equivalent to the masters degree of my profession. I have a document stating the same from the board who is responsible for licensing.
My question is that since my process is already initiated in EB3 can i also start it under EB2? Do i have to withdraw the earlier EB3 if i want to proceed with EB2? Please let me know if that is allowed or not.
My question is that since my process is already initiated in EB3 can i also start it under EB2? Do i have to withdraw the earlier EB3 if i want to proceed with EB2? Please let me know if that is allowed or not.
hairstyles tattoo hairstyles Emma Stone
gcpool
04-18 06:49 PM
http://www.myvisajobs.com/
maverick80
02-11 06:40 AM
I was talking to an attorney over the phone today and she said that PERM can be filed followed by 140 even if I am outside the country (working for an overseas department of the company) and I can come back on L1 / H1B, because GC is for future employment.
We were discuussing this because I was concerned that I may not be able to file H1 extension if the PERM is not filed 365 days before H1 extension.
This would be totally awesome coz I would love to work in some other country for a while.
Is this really true? (seems too good to be considering that everything else seems stacked up against us). Oh, if it matters to the discussion: I'm in EB2/India/retrogressed ad infinitum.
We were discuussing this because I was concerned that I may not be able to file H1 extension if the PERM is not filed 365 days before H1 extension.
This would be totally awesome coz I would love to work in some other country for a while.
Is this really true? (seems too good to be considering that everything else seems stacked up against us). Oh, if it matters to the discussion: I'm in EB2/India/retrogressed ad infinitum.
sanjay02
02-13 01:40 AM
Try the FOIA Freedom of Information
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder